Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armed conflicts

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was redirect to war Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 21:53, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

Armed conflicts
This is a page that tries to list all armed conflicts in the world in an "A vs. B, (1990)" format. I think it's supposed to list only ongoing conflicts. The listings of A and B can be interesting at times: "Somalia vs. Rival Clans (1991)", "Israel vs. Palestinan Authority; Hezbollah; Palestinan Separatists; Arab World (1948)", "USA; UK; Australlia vs. Iraq; France (2003)". (That last one was in a previous edit). I can't see this ever being a useful resource because of three reasons: 1) defining each individual conflict 2) identifying the parties for inclusion on either side 3) determining ongoing/dormant/resolved conflicts. Feco 02:22, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Apologies to all for doing a VfD on what should have been an easy redirect. I didn't bother to check for a properly named Armed conflict article, which probably would have clued me in to redirecting to war. Can someone fill me in on the details of archiving a VfD discussion? I want to put a link to these comments on the article's talk page. Feco 13:12, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Should be redirected to war, but you were right to bring it here. I agree with your points, btw. Meelar (talk) 02:24, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to War. Megan1967 06:16, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect -- to War. It'd make for a troublesome list that reads like a football fixture otherwise. - Longhair | Talk 06:24, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect (formerly Keep) It is difficult to imagine how a timeline of armed conflicts would not be a useful resource since timelines of wars long have been. At least I seem to recall it coming up rather often in school.  And what with war being such a blurry concept these days shoving a list of fights with weapons under War risks arguments about the inclusion of cancer and drugs and the removal of things like Korea and Vietnam. (prak 06:37, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC))
 * Perhaps renaming it would be clearer. Something like Armed conflicts (list) or Armed conflicts (timeline) (prak 06:40, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC))
 * We already have many lists of wars and armed conflicts, including List of operations and projects (military and non-military), List of invasions, all of the articles at Category:List of wars, all of the articles at Category:Wars by region, and all of the articles at Category:Lists of battles. This article is a simple duplicate, and your proposed renaming, which doesn't follow the naming conventions for lists, doesn't fix that. Uncle G 13:27, 2005 Apr 27 (UTC)
 * I was wrong. Thank you for the correction. (prak 16:16, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC))
 * Redirect as above. Radiant_* 09:34, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * armed conflict already redirects to war, and so in accord with the Naming conventions (plurals) it seems wise to redirect armed conflicts to war, too. Uncle G 13:27, 2005 Apr 27 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. Should have been done automatically, w/o VfD. Pavel Vozenilek 12:41, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.