Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armed suit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge to Ghost in the Shell. --Ezeu 22:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Armed suit
Contested prod. Prod rational "fancruft. far too in-universe, and I doubt this will ever be "fixed"". I would prefer delete but some merging might be acceptable. -- Ned Scott 06:49, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions.   -- Ned Scott 06:51, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Ghost in the Shell. If the article has had more information with sources, I think it can have it's own name. Cheers -- Imo  eng  06:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, if not, then Merge into Ghost in the Shell. These things do serve a decent purpose in the series, but I think the article does need some work. SuperDT 13:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * merge to Ghost in the Shell or weak keep, if expanded to include Landmates and other Masamune Shirou mecha. Shiroi Hane 17:55, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Yptype 09:50, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge or Delete I prefer delete over merge as this seem to be original research, however we have several GiTS tech articles which need to be updated to follow the fiction writing guidelines and merging them would also help them to within the fiction notability guidelines which suggest concatenating such info.  Ghost in the Shell really isn't a viable merge point.  --Kunzite 04:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Ghost in the Shell glossary (just like Neon Genesis Evangelion glossary). And maybe we could merge List of organizations in Ghost in the Shell into there as well. - kollision 09:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.