Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armenia–Grenada relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:39, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Armenia–Grenada relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. the relationship is merely recognition. No evidence of state visits, trade agreements, embassies or significant interaction. Keep voters must show evidence of actual bilateral relations in third party sources LibStar (talk) 14:59, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Armenia and Grenada do have a bilatral agreement and recognition and also they are proof from the link and the References. (Kylekieran (talk) 16:10, 1 July 2012 (UTC))
 * they merely issued a joint statement. Please provide evidence of actual significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 02:57, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge This minimal info would be better copied to Foreign relations of Armenia and Foreign relations of Grenada, a sentence in each (the Armenia article has a table into which an entry could be added). --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:26, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:26, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:26, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

* Keep - They both have a bilateral relations and also this page would get more and more detail now and in the future. (Jope2 (talk) 22:31, 2 July 2012 (UTC)) striking out blocked sock puppet of Kylekieran. LibStar (talk) 03:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC) — Jope2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * having bilateral relations is not a criterion for notability. LibStar (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

* Keep - This page very interesting to read and they are a lot of fact about the relationship. (Bbuk2 (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2012 (UTC)) striking out blocked sock puppet of Kylekieran. LibStar (talk) 03:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC) — Bbuk2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 
 * Delete per nom. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 20:15, 8 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable, does not need its own article. Any information can be merged into other articles. CodeTheorist (talk) 22:13, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * In fact perhaps we could merge to Foreign relations of Grenada all of the following trivial articles

Grenada–Libya relations, Finland–Grenada relations, People's Republic of China–Grenada relations, Grenada–South Korea relations, Grenada–Holy See relations, Grenada–North Korea relations and Grenada–Japan relations as well. CodeTheorist (talk) 22:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The cited reference is too thin a basis for significance. FeatherPluma (talk) 06:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - while even two small nations could have notable bilateral relations, this is clearly not one of those. Bearian (talk) 19:08, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * For what it is worth, I think People's Republic of China–Grenada relations and Grenada–Holy See relations, might be notable, and would deserve separate AfD discussions (China's trade with Grenada appears to be significant, and Grenada's population is 2/3 Roman Catholic). Grenada–Libya relations, Grenada–South Korea relations, Grenada–North Korea relations and Grenada–Japan relations are probably not notable, but to be fair, those articles need to be separately prodded or nominated at AfD for deletion. Bearian (talk) 19:13, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * On second thought, I prodded Grenada–Libya relations, but Grenada–North Korea relations might be a keeper. Bearian (talk) 19:21, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * On further look-see, I think Grenada–South Korea relations are also notable. Bearian (talk) 19:33, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Likewise on Grenada–Japan relations - they have had some trade and high-level contacts. Bearian (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.