Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armenian Space Station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star  Mississippi  01:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Armenian Space Station

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

non-notable band. no significant coverage or charting PRAXIDICAE💕  18:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and California. Shellwood (talk) 18:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)


 * There are hundreds of less notable bands on wikipedia, and Armenian Space Station is a current topic, as the rest of their new album is expected to drop this year. Their albums have not charted, but they have had significant ties with many more musicians. The pianist (Greg Hosharian) has been involved with the band Redemption, which has its own article, and many of his own groups, none of which have and article. The drummer (Barrett Yeretsian) is mentioned in the producer section of many wiki articles, including some of those of Jean Bostic, who also has her own article. the coverage is not only adequate but proves the relevance of the band. AJunior0923 (talk) 18:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:OSE is not a valid argument and you've failed to provide a single source that establishes anything close to notability. PRAXIDICAE💕  18:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * A Heavy Magazine article seems very notable to me, as well as much proof of the relations between the band members and other notable artists. AJunior0923 (talk) 19:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Delete No legitimate coverage. All the sources are user submitted sites. Heavy Magazine coverage is just a press release and video, on a site that solicits submissions of press releases and promo material for content. ShelbyMarion (talk) 07:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * There are other various magazines and sources that aren't user submitted that still cover them so that isn't a valid argument. The overall coverage shows significant notability. AJunior0923 (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Then please add them to the references. It is the only way to earn a legitimate keep vote. A google reveals promotional and user submitted stuff, but I don't see a single instance of signficant independent coverage. That's different than something that merely proves existence with blurbs about appearances or releases. They were active over a decade ago, so perhaps there is something from back in the day that is escaping research done over the internet? ShelbyMarion (talk) 19:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I think sources 4 and 5 fit those requirements. The wikipedia article on notability says that you must have 2 independent people write about the subject for it to be considered notable. AJunior0923 (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Research what constitutes a Wikipedia reliable source. It's not a simple mater of being the subject of something someone writes. You cited a blog (source 4) and a student newspaper (source 5). Neither of those qualify. ShelbyMarion (talk) 20:53, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Draftify Notability unchanged from when I declined it at AfC. — PerfectSoundWhatever  (t; c) 15:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.