Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armenians in Greece


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep. The reason for the nomination cannot be reconciled with the content of the article. This is not an article about a work of fiction; it is about a real ethnic group. If someone has a relevant reason to request deletion of this article, they are free to renominate it. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Armenians in Greece

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. Plot summary and original research for a marginally significant character. No sources to back this evinde up. It is like made up story with no real evidence to support this.--NovaSkola (talk) 22:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Strong Delete. Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. --LightAtmosphere (talk) 22:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)--LightAtmosphere (talk) 22:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Um... what? To the nominator: did you miss and hit the wrong article here, or am I reading this wrong - the article is not about anything fictional, nor is it about a character. Speedy keep and an explanation would be nice. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. (Edit Conflict) Why does the nomination for the article have nothing to do with the article itself? It talks about "original research for a marginally significant character" when the article is about a group of people living in a nation. I'm assuming good faith on the part of the nominator, but if this AfD is to stand, I'd prefer it if the nominator could revise their statement to match their reasoning for the article's deletion instead of a different article's. -- Nomader (Talk) 22:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I apologise for silly copy typo. I fixed the nomination.--NovaSkola (talk) 22:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: It wasn't a copy typo that was the problem... it was that the nomination seems to be for a different article, and it still seems to be. Your nomination talks about nothing that has to do with the article -- the article itself is not on a character at all. I understand that this can be kind of confusing at first glance, but I'd suggest you try to work with other nominations before you put this up for deletion again. For now, I'm going to vote speedy keep. -- Nomader (Talk) 22:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, a candidate for Speedy Keep for sure, it still looks like you have either the wrong article or the wrong nom statement up there. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 23:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Going by nominator's edit history, this was a purposeful nomination with a confusing rationale meant to make nominators who would not read the article vote delete just for the popular "plot summary" reason. I want to assume good faith, but this needs to be closed. Going without the actual nom reason, as Greece and Armenia are within the same region, there is no reason to delete this at all.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep as an incoherent nomination. If something reasonable was intended, should be tried again properly. DGG (talk) 04:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.