Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arminka Helic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete this article. NAC— S Marshall T/C 11:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)'''

Arminka Helic

 * – ( View AfD View log )

None of the references have significant coverage. Also doesn't satisfy Notability criteria for politicians Shashwat986 (talk) 07:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. WP:POLITICIAN isn't that useful here because it only really covers elected politicians (and, if different, members of governments), and Alistair Campbell can tell you how powerful a special adviser can become. As for this one, I'm not sure. A GNews search shows she's getting some media attention, but nothing as the subject of on article, but this article from The Telegraph named her as one of the top 100 right-wingers. It's difficult to measure notability in this case because she seems to be deliberately staying under the media radar. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 09:46, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep As above, she's not a politician but is in a position of importance as advisor to one of the top 5 politicians in the UK. Some media coverage, I'm inclined to keep for now and see if more sources can be unearthed. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 18:45, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Appears to be some serious interest, which makes her borderline for the WP:GNG and WP:DIPLOMAT. Ray  Talk 15:02, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.