Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armless Tiger Man


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. A possible merge can be discussed on the article talk page. Randykitty (talk) 18:38, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Armless Tiger Man

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG. Page is linked in the body of four articles, and the character appears eight times according to Marvel Wikia. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 16:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources noted below supporting the WP:GNG, or failing that merge into List of Marvel Comics characters: A or List of Marvel Comics Golden Age characters. No need to delete when merge is a valid option. BOZ (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - No toher likely target and fails WP:GNG. --Killer Moff (talk) 14:55, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: A. An extremely minor character, whose only sources are primary.  However, his name is unusual enough that it could be a valid search term, so a redirect and selective merge would be fine.  169.232.162.112 (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Cracked has an entertaining account of the character and it's not difficult to find similar coverage elsewhere. The nomination's assertion about the WP:GNG is therefore false while its claims about Wikia are remarkably irrelevant. Andrew D. (talk) 10:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The information provided from the Marvel Wikia goes directly to a lack of significance within the fiction. Marvel has published 60+ comics a month for almost 80 years. A character appearing in only 8 of those says a lot about his lack of importance. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete does not meet my criteria for merging or redirect. Coverage of the character in list articles of oddball comic characters doesn't demonstate notability. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes the WP:GNG. Comic Book Resources gives significant coverage to the character at  Screen Rant mention him at .  This and other coverage found and mentioned count.   D r e a m Focus  00:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.