Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armor of God


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Once the OR is removed, nothing but a bible quote remains. Also unsourced. May be recreated if sufficiently sourced for notability purposes.  Sandstein  17:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Armor of God

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article appears to not follow WP:OR as it is written in the form of a religious sermon/message. Also, fails WP:NPOV with statements on Christianity Finalnight (talk) 06:05, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.   -- Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  09:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Definately sounds like OR to me.Yobmod (talk) 09:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Essay/sermon/original research, not encyclopaedic anyway -Hunting dog (talk) 11:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, weakly, without prejudice. The metaphor from Ephesians is easily notable enough to support an article, and there surely is sufficient public commentary out there to make one.  This is just the author's personal interpretation, though. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:10, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, weakly, per Smerdis. It may not be as notable as Good Samaritan but the term is old enough that I expect there's far more references out there with which an appropriate encyclopedic article could be written.  I would expect that there might be references from Constantine to the Crusades, for instance. Jclemens (talk) 20:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable and OR per Yobmod. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable term. Remove the OR. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 03:22, 27 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.