Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armory (military)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Arsenal. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 09:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Armory (military)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a dictionary. A somewhat more historically perceptive presentation is at Arsenal. The definitions are identical on the two pages. Other wikis do have the two, I can't see why. trespassers william (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Don't delete. At most this is a discussion of a proposed merge, not a deletion.  It appears to me that there's relevant material in both articles. --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:17, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Arsenal, then - something that should have been boldy done instead of sent to AfD. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the votes. I almost did, but it never make sense that one kind of complete removal takes a clear consensus and the other can be done solo. Anyway, if you walk the walk, what points do you think should be merged? trespassers william (talk) 23:11, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Arsenal. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Arsenal. It's the same thing, no need for two separate articles. —  dain  omite   15:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.