Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arms and Sleepers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  05:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Arms and Sleepers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Band doesn't appear to meet notability standards. All but one of the sources cited in the current version of the page go to dead links, and I can't find any substantial media coverage of the band elsewhere (this is presumably because they haven't put out a physical release with a proper record label since 2007). Page has been flagged for notability and multiple issues since May 2015. Smells like content (talk) 15:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  16:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  16:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I'm seeing significant coverage in e.g. XLR8R, NPR , Sputnikmusic staff review , Tiny Mix Tapes , Under the Gun , Earmilk , QRO , Ransom Note . Sufficient US and UK press to hurdle WP:MUSIC. Chubbles (talk) 00:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Weird, not sure how I missed those. Completely agree that this level of coverage means the page should be kept. Smells like content (talk) 10:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Requesting Speedy Close as nominator is withdrawing. Chubbles (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.