Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Army Deputy Surgeon General


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Basically, wrong content of the article. If anyone would like to create an article about Rubenstein, let me know. Tone 21:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Army Deputy Surgeon General

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The position of "Army Deputy Surgeon General" does not, afaik, have any notability attached to it, and that's ignoring the fact that it doesn't directly address the position anyway. Fails WP:GNG, delete. Ironholds (talk) 23:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge - to Surgeon General of the United States Army. I think it's a pretty notable position, but it doesn't merit its own article.  ceran  thor 19:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 23:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of US-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 23:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete it's actually just the bio of a three star; not particularly notable. Buckshot06(prof) 01:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: per Buckshot. The article is incorrectly named for a start, as it is actually about David Rubenstein and not the position of Deputy Surgeon General. Rubenstein might be notable (given that he is a major general), although with all due respect to the man from what I can see it seems that he has had a fairly uneventful career (it would be easier to assess notability if a proper biography were written, rather than the resume that this article is). Finally, the article is little more than a copy and paste job of the USAMD biography which is probably in the public domain, thus not a copy violation, however, its existence on Wiki adds nothing more to the internet as a whole. — AustralianRupert (talk) 14:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.