Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnergy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 23:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Arnergy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

They have move warred over this, so AFD is the best option. This is really good covert upe so you have to closely to nab it. The organization fails WP:NCORP as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. The ref bombing is intentionally put there to inundate an editor not trained to see it, you could do a private google search before voting, but having done mine diligently, the sources observed are predominantly mere mentions, press releases, pr sponsored posts, self published posts and sources which are yet to develop a reputation for fact checking or without editorial oversight. The article has 0 WP:ORGDEPTH. This article is created perfectly by a 4 day old editor, Invariably this article is a very good WP:ADMASQ. This is undisclosed paid editing at its best. Celestina007 (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep it. I did hard work to form this article. Any neutral admin should review the sources such as CNN, BBC, CGTN, CNBC Africa. passes WP:GNG. EmilioVally (talk) 22:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment — All the sources do not directly reference Arnergy neither do they satisfy WP:SIGCOV, required by WP:GNG, coupled with the fact that the third source you linked above is to YouTube, coupled with the fact that you are an WP:SPA for the organization, coupled with the fact that within four days you know wikimarkup quite well, coupled with the fact that this is undisclosed paid editing, coupled with the fact that rather than submit the article via AFC, you move-warred, there’s no universe where this sort of COI/UPE article would be retained on mainspace. We agree that we were born at night but certainly it wasn’t last night. Celestina007 (talk)


 * Delete. Per nom, nice work. User introduced minor changes to Oando to get autoconfirmed, then immediately plonked an article about their favorite company. User is immediately familiar with wiki lingo such as "admin" or "passes WP:GNG". Sure sure sure. The sources brought up in the comment above are mostly interviews and pitches with little to no independent journalistic work, and thus fail WP:SIRS. JBchrch   talk  22:18, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent sources. Sonofstar (talk) 13:54, 6 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.