Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arno Political Consultants


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star  Mississippi  21:15, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Arno Political Consultants

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. There aren't multiple, in-depth sources covering the subject. User:Namiba 18:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and California. User:Namiba 18:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I recognize that the cited sources do not present much text about this organization, but the claims that those sources make are significant. This organization plays key roles recognized by journalists in a range of high profile political conflicts. WP:SIGCOV is a reason to exclude sources which having passing mentions of news items. Several of these cited sources, though brief, describe the subject of this article as a power influencing the outcomes of elections. Also this content is not promotional - we have sources with a range of perspectives on this organization's projects. I think this passes WP:GNG.  Bluerasberry   (talk)  21:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Notability is not inherited by being involved in high profile political conflicts.--User:Namiba 21:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the coverage appears to actually about them, but the issues. The conflicts might be notable, but just because they play a role does not mean that the consulting group itself is notable much like how a notable court case does not by default make a lawyer or law firm notable by extension. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I agree, they are involved in various "things", but coverage is about them in relation to the things and talking about the things themselves. Not quite at GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 19:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.