Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Heredia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 11:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Arnold Heredia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable priest, found this but it is related to subject so not independent. Nothing else found, fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  10:51, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep -- If the content is true, the subject was a significant human rights campaigner in Pakistan from the 1970s until he moved to Australia in 2005. The circumstances of his move are not explained in the article, but it may be that his campaigning had made Pakistan unsafe for him to remain in.  You should not expect to find as good Internet sources on religious subjects in Pakistan as you would in UK or America. Furthermore there may be transliteration issues, for sources in local languages; and some Christian activity in Pakistan has to operate at a clandestine level, due to infamous anti-blasphemy laws.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable Pakistani-Australian priest, minority/refugee rights activist. Founding member of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. Target of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi assassination attempt in 2001. Prominent leader in inter-faith protests against Pakistan's blasphemy laws.   Subject of Amnesty profile.


 * Regards,--Goldsztajn (talk) 00:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep as there is enough reliable sources coverage identified above to enable a pass of WP:BASIC so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.