Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Philimon Peter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  11:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Arnold Philimon Peter

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. No real secondary sourcing. Not one in the block. They are profiles, primary and sps sources, passing mentions.  scope_creep Talk  10:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:00, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete not meeting WP:GNG. --2600:6C50:7E00:400:346E:7B56:2AB8:7FB9 (talk) 14:22, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: IP 2600:6C50:7E00:400:346E:7B56:2AB8:7FB9 started editing on 4 September. Total of edits to date are 'delete' comments on four AfDs. This is suspicious. David notMD (talk) 12:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.