Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnolds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 18:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Arnolds

 * – (View AfD)

Non-notable restaurant per WP:CORP and WP:Notability (restaurants). Incidental mentions on the web, nothing substantial in GNews or GScholar. -- Kickstart70 T C 07:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:33, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:33, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:33, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. I added some references to the article.  Does anyone speak better Finnish to help find some more media references to Arnolds?  If what is listed on the company's news page can be verified, then it will meet the notability requirements.  Linguist At Large  10:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Your references are 1) that a music band happened to be there, and 2) a directory listing of an address of a location. Neither prove notability. Please check WP:CORP and WP:REST for what can confer notability. -- Kickstart70 T C 17:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. While I think there are still problems with proper sourcing, I think you misread the article about the band. EMI has a distribution deal with Arnolds to exclusively distribute the band's single.  Linguist At Large  19:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It may be telling in this case that the band in question also does not have a page here. -- Kickstart70 T C 02:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

*Strong Keep - Meets notability guidelines...asserts that notability in the intro paragraph David WS <sub style="color:lime;">(contribs)  15:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per above--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 14:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * An assertion of notability does not prove notability. Please check WP:CORP and WP:REST for what can confer notability. -- Kickstart70 T C 17:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand that, I meant that as two seperate things. One: it asserts, Two: it passes.  <sub style="color:red;">David <sup style="color:cornflowerblue;">WS  <sub style="color:lime;">(contribs)  18:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep: per LAL. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 17:09, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Vote changed to delete: I took a look at the sources again and they do not show notability per WP:CORP. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 17:27, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage in reliable sources; fails WP:CORP. Tan   &#124;   39  17:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I fail at not completely looking at the sources. <sub style="color:red;">David <sup style="color:cornflowerblue;">WS  <sub style="color:lime;">(contribs)  18:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment, if kept, rename to proper name, Arnolds should redirect to Arnold 76.66.201.13 (talk) 06:53, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment, if deleted, redirect to Arnold. 76.66.201.13 (talk) 06:53, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.