Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aro Ngwa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Aro people. (non-admin closure) Aerospeed (Talk) 21:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Aro Ngwa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There a is a staggering amount of issues raised on this page, including notability. I think it would be much better to either just delete this page, or create a summary of it on the 'Aro People' page - Kiwuser   (talk)  06:05, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 08:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 08:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 08:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   03:16, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Redirect to Aro people. While a potentially notable topic the lack of reliable sources identifying it as a distinct topic within the context of the wider Aro people leaves no attributable justification for a separate article. GraniteSand (talk) 03:23, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * It is unethical and callous to suggest that a page be deleted because it has some material that relate to another page or to suggest that it be merged with another — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.58.24.61 (talk • contribs)
 * In as much as I agree that developing the contents of a page to make it more interesting is good, but arguing that it should be deleted or merged with another page: 'Aro People' is not only callous and segregatory, but phobic. A people have the right to have a unique identity, ditto to a page. Aro Ngwa as a page has a right to self-determination. Tracing their root from Arochukwu does not mean they are Arochukwu persons. Right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.58.11.168 (talk • contribs)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  10:12, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.