Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aron siegel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 05:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Aron siegel

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD. No reliable sources are provided that establish notability or provide verifiability. The record of work from IMDB does not support notability either. Whpq (talk) 10:11, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  01:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Week delete. Lots of sources. Nothing really notable. Might there be more? Schmidt,  ''MICHAEL Q. 02:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - if you actually click through them you will find some of them are dead links, and none of them would be called reliable as they include sites that are related to him, or in the case of the Polish DJ site, it appears to be a reprint/rehash of material from his own site based on the credit in the article. -- Whpq (talk) 03:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Changed from weak. Bad links.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * comment I am new to the wikipedia environment. I am continually trying to add information, but I seem to be unable to create the proper notations for article Aron Siegel.  I would like more time to enter in these links and footnotes on the article.Vinylm (talk) 06:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Time is what you may not have. However, and in the hope the article can be improved, go to the article, click "edit this page", and then copy the entire thing to User:Vinylm/sandbox (the link will turn blue as soon as there's something there. This way you can work on improving it at your leisure and need not fret if it gets deleted here. Study other similar articles. See how they source themselves and how they prove their notability. And in fact, you may always ask for advice. Many here will be glad to listen. There is no rush. Take your time. Make it great.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

also, it appears as though a few of the links that were valid, are down at the moment. specifically discomuseum.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinylm (talk • contribs) 14:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * At least can keep working on it. I'm glad you moved it to your sandbox. Make it as strong as possible. Good luck. Have fun.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hers fold  (t/a/c) 13:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.