Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrest of Nicole Naugler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 18:36, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Arrest of Nicole Naugler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP1E. The fact that the subject received "quite a lot" of news coverage for that one event (seizure of the children), does not make them notable in the long-term significance long term. Govindaharihari (talk) 09:44, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; pretty clear BLP1E. ukexpat (talk) 12:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Textbook example of BLP1E. Collect (talk) 13:20, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominated. Unless there is some lasting change because of it (laws changed, etc.) then it does not warrant inclusion in the 'pedia.  Scr ★ pIron IV 13:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per the others - 1 event, coverage in news sources is largely tabloid-style sensationalism. No evidence of lasting notability. Fyddlestix (talk) 16:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with comments above. I also think that BLP1E applies in this case.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:00, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nom. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 20:03, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  General Ization  Talk   21:14, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete (draft/userfy if needed although unlikely there'll be much more to this) and a lot of coverage? Yes but nothing to suggest notability aside from other related events. At best, this would be better mentioned somewhere else appropriate and not an entire article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.