Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrow to the knee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete (closing as snow/speedy). Neutralitytalk 22:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Arrow to the knee

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NN neologism. Failed with 3  endorsements when IP objected Toddst1 (talk) 17:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:N. Cocoaguy ここがいい 19:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Somebody deprod'd this thing when it had 3 endorsements, somehow imagining it'd be kept? This piece of garbage fails pretty much every inclusion criteria we've got. There's not a WP:SNOWball's chance of it being kept, just delete it now instead of wasting time on a procedural AfD. --IllaZilla (talk) 19:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - This should be so unambiguously evident I don't feel the need to come up with some complete argument.  Salvidrim!   20:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete WP is not a collection of jokes and catch phrases. BigJim707 (talk) 21:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:N until it starts getting coverage in reliable, third party sources. Sergecross73   msg me   21:48, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.