Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsenal (car)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:47, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Arsenal (car)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I could not find an English source but perhaps you are more skilled at searching than I am. The German article has a source but I cannot read it. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:06, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:06, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and England.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:57, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. I could find the following through Google Books: The Automotor and Horseless Vehicle Journal 1898 The Autocar 1898 gidonb (talk) 15:08, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Another source: London Daily Mail, Nov 15, 1898, p. 8. gidonb (talk) 18:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Would appear to have sufficient sources to meet WP:GNG. We usually keep automobile marques in any case. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - There should be more sources out there on this and if it's an early car like this, it's definitely important.KatoKungLee (talk) 05:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although more sources need to be added for this to be a decent article. CycloneYoris talk! 22:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.