Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsenal Football Club vs. Matthew Reed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 19:30, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Arsenal Football Club vs. Matthew Reed

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The encyclopaedic notability of this subject is not established in the article. The sources are all from niche journals or official legal records, rather than establishing a general level of notability. For this, I would expect the subject to have been covered by a news outlet. – PeeJay 10:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – PeeJay 10:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep I am going to say keep, however I think the title of the article needs to be adjusted. There are sources like daily telegraph, INTA (which is one of the largest organisations for help in Trademarks), others . Plus I think the article needs a cleanup. Govvy (talk) 10:49, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as appears notable, but needs big clean up and a rename to Arsenal Football Club v Reed as is standard for British legal cases. GiantSnowman 10:56, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Law's list of law-related deletions. – GiantSnowman 10:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Rename Arsenal Football Club v Reed per GiantSnowman. Lawsuits involving Premier League clubs are usually notable, and according to the text, it has special relevance in trademark law. Article should also be edited and updated, it ends with: "To date (April 2007..." —МандичкаYO 😜 11:23, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nfitz (talk) 18:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.   Bait30   Talk? 05:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.