Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arshad Khan (model) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Chaiwala. Rounding to redirect. Furthermore, the current text is a WP:COPYVIO of this (not to mention WP:G11). The only place it's recoverable to seems to be the same place that got it CSD'ed the first time around. slakr \ talk / 03:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Arshad Khan (model)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP1E: Single event, low-profile individual, event has no lasting significance. GSS (talk) 10:57, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 10:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 10:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - This person is now being reported very often by the local media which makes him notable. --Saqib (talk) 11:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * — Note to closing admin: Saqib (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
 * Even if the subject is being reported by local media single event is still exists and per BLP1E "Being in the news does not in itself mean that someone should be the subject of a Wikipedia article." – GSS (talk) 11:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This is not a case of only one event. The media coverage of this individual has grown larger so an article is justified. Many major newspapers gave a significant attention to this model. As per Notability_(people), if someone "has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment."  and also "has a large fan base." the subject ma y justify an article and in my opinion, this individual has. After making his runway debut, Arshad Khan has made his first appearance in a music video as well. --Saqib (talk) 12:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Well the subject has appeard only in one music video so far and its WP:TOOSOON for a stand alone article and the notability of the musician/artist of the music video is also in question. I don't see anything to support large fan base and we can not rely on social media fan following. GSS (talk) 13:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * In worst case, I suggest to redirect this to Chaiwala. --Saqib (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Chaiwala.  sami  talk 20:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - purely promotional as it stands. Deb (talk) 18:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 18:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 12:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

User:GSS-1987: This guy keep making news. Recently, named amongst the sexiest asian mans of 2016 by Eastern Eye. --Saqib (talk) 13:53, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you think it's enough for a stand alone article and passes WP:ENTERTAINER. I still belive it's WP:TOOSOON for an article on Wikipedia. GSS (talk) 17:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think this entry should be labeled as TOOSOON, but for sure, he'll managed to get get one soon. Dawn (newspaper) reported the model has started working on upcoming film Kabeer. --Saqib (talk) 07:33, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe in future when he play a significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions as per WP:NACTOR. GSS (talk) 08:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)


 * delete I don't think it currently meets WP:ENTERTAINER and I don't see any reliable sources that currently could get the article up to the required notability. I agree with u|GSS that it may also be too soon. Current coverage is because of a single instance of a photo going viral (though it is a verrrryy nice photo ) Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.