Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arshiya Lokhandwala


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 21:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Arshiya Lokhandwala

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, It has been more than 4 years when this article was created and there are only 1,800 results.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 *  Weak Delete I only found one news source with a mention of the name and cannot establish that it meets WP:GNG. MrScorch6200  (talk &#124; ctrb) 00:08, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I found one primary source (you could count it as a secondary) that establishes notability, and it says that see founded a museum: http://curatorsintl.org/collaborators/arshiya_lokhandwala MrScorch6200  (talk &#124; ctrb) 00:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article lacks significant coverage and fails the general notability guideline.  C ute st Penguin ( Talk ) 05:57, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - curators of private art galleries rarely qualify, and this appears to be no exception. I had wanted this speedied as spam, and the worst has been removed. Now that the trashy stuff has been removed, it's obvious that the subject's notability was tenuous. --  Ohc  ¡digame! 12:39, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't really see a claim of notability in the article, nor the in-depth coverage of her and her works (not just announcements of shows by other artists at the gallery she runs) that would be necessary for WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:51, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.