Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsho


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. (Non-administrator closure.) NorthAmerica1000 21:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Arsho

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability guidelines for films. There is no coverage in reliable sources. The sources provided in article are blogs/forums/facebook. Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 07:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * WP:INDAFD: Arsho
 * WP:INDAFD: Arsho
 * WP:INDAFD: Arsho


 * Keep Sorry nominator, but addressable article issues aside, the film HAS been released and IS getting coverage in reliable sources. WP:NF is met. What is needed is editorial attention, not deletion.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:31, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing toward that. I did google search before nominating and indeed did not get any proper sources. I should have used Tito's tool. I have analyzed sources pointed out by you. Only one newspaper (the tribune) has published about 4 news items, which will be regarded as single source for the purpose of notability. One others HindustanTimes only has photos (no articles), I don't think that can be taken as sign of notability. Photos are easily published in online version of the newspaper. In case of 2 others FirstPost and Times of India word "Arsho" is used in totally other context and has no relation to the subject. So this film does not have coverage in multiple sources, and I will go with Delete.-- Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 12:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * As the film was only just released, and is already gaining positive response, I believe that more coverage will be in the offing, not less. Toward addressing the addressable, poor sources have been removed from the article and it is currently being expanded and sourced with far better ones, as well as being tagged for editorial attention... I would think this a far better way to deal with new articles on arguably notable topics than is deletion. Of course, one must be careful when stating that multiple articles in the area's one major news source should be counted as only one news source. We do not expect Punjabi language film to be covered in New York Times or Variety, and while I do not have the ability to find the expected non-English coverage, I will still contend that film notability has been established. See WP:HANDLE, WP:WIP, WP:IMPROVE, WP:IMPERFECT, and WP:DEADLINE.   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 15:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I think you are right. I could find some Punjabi sources in local newspapers. It is better I withdraw the nomination. -- Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 07:02, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.