Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArtRage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (nomination withdrawn). --Itub (talk) 08:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

ArtRage

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Fails notability. No third party sources cited. No third party sources found - although sources would be difficult to locate on the Internet as "ArtRage" appears to also be an art festival. GDallimore (Talk) 17:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I added five third party sources. Contrary to the nominator's claim that they would be difficult to locate, a Google news archive search for ArtRage Ambient worked well enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Now up to nine sources, most of them in third-party publications that are themselves notable enough to have articles here. That seems a clear pass of WP:N to me. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:02, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There seems to be a core of notability here... being bundled with Microsoft and Wacom tablets is a pretty big deal. There are sources, but it's best to search for Artrage +tablet instead of just Artrage alone. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 04:43, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - sources establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 16:59, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.