Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArtZuid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

ArtZuid

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

written like ad copy. fails general notability guideline. coverage is not enough for a comprehensive article. ltb d l (talk) 15:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ltb d l (talk) 15:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep I just added a few references. There is more than enough coverage for a comprehensive article. That said, I agree that the style and lay-out needs improvement. Will work on it. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 00:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep per Ruud, the GNG, and AFDISNOTCLEANUP. gidonb (talk) 01:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Rudd Buite, has been improved and additional sources added. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.