Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art Griffin's Sound Chaser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 02:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Art Griffin's Sound Chaser

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is premature. I wish the band all the best but currently, they have only released a single and have not yet generated sufficient media coverage. Pichpich (talk) 20:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  20:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  20:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete All sources are social media - Facebook. I am unable to find any evidence of RS coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. J bh  Talk  20:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. A band does not get a Wikipedia article so long as the sourceability is limited exclusively to their own social media profiles — it takes reliable source coverage, in media independent of their own PR machine, to get a band in the door here. Bearcat (talk) 20:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic   Nightfury  07:35, 25 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 07:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Due to a bug in the relist tool and Cavarrone's double-relist on 2 November, the transclusion on that day's log page was commented out. Fixing now.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Finngall  talk  15:05, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete As for my own view, I found no reliable sources to support this article. Looks closer to A7-speedy bait, actually. -- Finngall   talk  15:32, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete As cited above, article lacks independent third party sources, only self-generated references. Such an obvious case for deletion that I'm surprised it has required numerous relistings for over a month. ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:07, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.