Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art Jimmerson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Consensus herein is for article retention. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 20:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Art Jimmerson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable fighter fails notability CrazyAces489 (talk) 13:52, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 14:01, 4 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 March 4.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 14:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Not a stellar record but does meet WP:NBOX through is NABF title fights.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Losing a series of NABF fights seems an unlikely way to be notable and I think is another indication that WP:NBOX is too generous. However, consensus prevails and he does appear to meet WP:NBOX. Papaursa (talk) 00:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep I am by no means an MMA/UFC historian, but I have read a lot about Jimmerson with regard to UFC 1. To my understanding, the original point to UFC was more of 'who is the best fighter with the best style' as opposed the the hybrid fight style of today.  Jimmerson was the boxer representative and boxing was then and still is a major fighting style (e.g., commercially, fan support, etc.).  I think a lot has been written about this fact and in general about UFC 1 (for example see, , and ).  I know this does not meet WP:NMMA, but think it supports GNG being met. RonSigPi (talk) 23:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.