Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art Monk Construction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:MUSIC does not apply to record labels. The relevant guidelines are WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. As such, I have not taken into account the arguments relating to WP:MUSIC. The other reference to WP:GNG in a keep !vote is just a WP:VAGUEWAVE. Therefore, if I take into account the !votes that rely on policy, I have to conclude that consensus is in favour of deletion, in this case. Salvio giuliano 09:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Art Monk Construction

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies,  and Pennsylvania.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 04:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:14, 6 February 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The roster is substantial and we have a couple of articles discussing the label's operations in depth, to boot. One of the more important indies as suggested by WP:MUSIC. Chubbles (talk) 02:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. This isn't my usual area, but in context of such low input...
 * WP:MUSIC doesn't seem to address record labels. So I think the guidelines for corporations is what I should look to. It has a high bar. The links in the article (interviews and passing mentions), my searches on google news (2 passing mentions) and google books (passing mentions) suggest this doesn't pass the notability threshold for me.
 * However, if I'm using the wrong metric, ping me, I'm open minded to change my opinion. CT55555 (talk) 04:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. This artice passes WP:MUSIC and GNG. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 15:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: It appears that while wiki-ed student and page creator User:AlbinoFlea was notified of the prod (removed by User:Chubbles), they were inadvertently not notified of this deletion procedure on January 23 when this process was commenced. I've pinged AlbinoFlea, notified them on their talkpage and have taken the liberty of emailing them just in case, intentionally calling their attention to this process. They do not seem to be active in the last few months, however. I'd request we not close this yet, at least until pagecreator has a chance to acknowledge the ping, possibly weigh in here, or until the relist expires on the 20th. BusterD (talk) 16:53, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Some editors above have !voted based on WP:MUSIC but record labels are not captured by those guidelines. This is a company so we need to look at GNG/WP:NCORP as the appropriate guidelines. Others say we have a couple of articles discussing the label's operations in depth. I disagree. We have some articles in (very) local newspapers interviewing the founders and the journalists do not provide any of the own opinions/viewpoints/analysis and so none of that content is "Independent", it is simply regurgitating a Primary source. Those all fail GNG/WP:ORGIND. Other sources are a mere mention-in-passing and fail GNG/WP:CORPDEPTH. I've looked to see if the label is mentioned in any books discussing music of that era and again, nothing that meets GNG/NCORP. FWIW, IMO it might be possible to create an article on Eric Astor, but not this label. Topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing++ 13:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.