Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art for Sale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete no reliable secondary sources to establish notability. Davewild (talk) 15:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Art for Sale

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N, WP:RS and WP:V ukexpat (talk) 15:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  15:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: The article does as far as I can determine meet all the requirements that are cited as objections. Firstly, the game ‘Art for Sale’, although it seems to be new has been cited on a few gaming forums. Secondly it can be verified that the game exists by going to the sited reference an downloading the game and must therefore a reliable source. Both the webpage and game should merit the inclusion of the article as the existence can be verified and there should not be any objection. In addition the game can also be found by searching for it on the net. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robroy865 (talk • contribs) 16:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)  — Robroy865 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep: I downloaded and played the game after reading its page on wikipedia. Think it fits well into the class of tycoon simulation games that it has been classed in. Carinasch.
 * Delete. No third-party sources cited to establish notability, such as formal reviews in gaming magazines. Hqb (talk) 17:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary coverage; fails WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Article for Deletion - article appears promotional in nature. No independent citations in article. Google can't be used effectively here since "art for sale" appears with regularity in advertisements. B.Wind (talk) 06:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.