Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art of Problem Solving (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Richard Rusczyk. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Art of Problem Solving
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The company lacks notability under WP:NCORP. The best available source is this review from Common Sense Media. Otherwise coverage is promotional or otherwise unreliable, with the current sourcing being nearly 100% from the company itself (or the website of one of its products). Speaking of promotional, the current writing feels more like a product advertisement than an article and so even if it is notable, would recommend TNT or major rewrite to avoid this issue. As an alternative to deletion recommend redirecting to Richard Rusczyk which had been done but was reverted. Barkeep49 (talk) 23:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 (talk) 23:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Mathematics,  and California.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. The previous AfDs were twelve years ago, so availability of sourcing may be better now. There appears to be some nontrivial coverage in and a short paragraph (maybe not enough depth to count for much) in, at least. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * FWIW, I did find McShane and included it in my analysis above in terms of being insufficient for NCORP. I had not found Baron. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the founder's article - he's clearly notable, and this is his vehicle, rather than being notable in itself. Llajwa (talk) 21:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Richard Rusczyk as above. Its notability seems to be borderline, but not really independent from Rusczyk. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.