Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arte Italica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  21:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Arte Italica

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Trivial passing mentions. No significant coverage in secondary sources. Lacks depth of coverage. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 09:43, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 11:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 11:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree. No evidence of notability. The only mentions are from retailers of the products. The press coverage seems to be about the products, not the importer. I'm a bit scornful of companies that claim notability for simply importing someone else's wares! Sionk (talk) 13:35, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.