Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artech (staffing company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 00:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Artech (staffing company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails the notability guidelines for organizations (WP:ORG) - Google research of the company fails to turn up any compelling notability. That's why recommending for an AfD discussion and derive a consensus. - Hatchens (talk) 12:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 12:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 12:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Important entity regarding women in tech, which is an underserved community in terms of representation on Wikipedia. Isingness (talk) 18:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I've also added some additional sources, including PBS, New Jersey Business magazine, and industry coverage of their focus on diversity in tech hiring. Isingness (talk) 18:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 06:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: I think that the Crain's New York listing is significant. The NJTV article/report is good, and specifically about Artech. The Wired article is a mention, but cites the company in the context of a larger trend. I believe there's enough here to satisfy notability. — Toughpigs (talk) 23:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sources listed in the reference section in this version are enough to pass it WP:GNG. - Ivan hersee (talk) 10:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The criteria for establishing notability is a tougher standard for references than those used to support facts within an article. Most of the references are based on interviews with the CEO (who happens to be female) or mentions-in-passing. I am unable to locate any referencess with Independent Content *and* in-depth information on the *company*. The PBS reference is based on "President and CEO Ranjini Poddar sat down with NJ Today's Desiree Taylor to discuss her business" - fails WP:ORGIND. The NJBiz article is a puff piece based on an interview with the CEO, also fails ORGIND. This Crain reference showcasing their "fast 50" is a video interview with the CEO and this is the supporting listing, both fail WP:ORGIND. The Wired reference is a mention-in-passing and fails WP:CORPDEPTH. And searching for any good references appears futile, I am unable to locate a single one. Topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing++ 19:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.