Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artemis (contemporary artist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 14:58, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Artemis (contemporary artist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

User:Betacommand2 tagged this for notability over six years ago, and no one has yet established that she meets WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG. The NYT source is very good, but I could find nothing else and there are no articles in other languages. Boleyn (talk) 10:20, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Boleyn, your arguments are enough to delete this article, IMHO. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 10:25, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I've added a couple of sources (to that 2005 event). There do appear to be more in French (eg.,,), Greek (eg.) and some in German - Google searches (you might have to skip a page of Facebook/name results) on Artemis Martin Frommelt (her former husband, also an artist), Artemis Anne Demanet (her former name) and Artemis Museum Jean-Lurgat (site of her 2013 exhibition) suggest she's still active and exhibiting. Could a speaker of any of those languages take a look and evaluate content/source? AnonNep (talk) 14:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (discuss)  @ 20:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete 1) only one source seems substantial 2) there is no entry in the French WP, which would be logical before reaching notability for the English one (albeit not a strict requirement). LaMona (talk) 21:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment The second reason sounds like WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 13:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Philg88 ♦talk 07:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable Op47 (talk) 22:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.