Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artemis DeLarge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete -- Longhair 03:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Artemis DeLarge
No notability established, failed google test, seems extremly vain. Yanksox 05:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:VAIN. Danny Lilithborne 06:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete it is a hoax. The flute picture was taken off the internet on a sales site. Ted 06:36, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Makes a claim to notability, but one so over the top that when it gets contradicted by the Google results, it comes across as (and probably is) WP:HOAX or at least extreme WP:VANITY. Fails WP:V. Also see WP:NFT. Agree with TedE. Morgan Wick 06:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It's funny, but not real... --Dakart 08:55, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn.--Jusjih 14:41, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious although bizzare vanity page. Ydam 16:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete yawn. Tyrenius 16:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy to account, then delete. &mdash;Viriditas | Talk 19:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Torn between Delete and Userfy. Sounds like WP:VANITY, but author appears to have written quite a bit of info, so… I'm such a softee. --Fbv65 e del (discuss 01:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Almost BJAODN, but I'm not sure it's funny enough... jgp 02:18, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as A7 & hoax. I am a musician and the page claims are false. You cannot just spontaneously claim to be a Virtuoso. :P ~Kylu ( u | t )  03:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * agree with Tyrenius-yawn...ignorance... the flute picture was, bought, neh?
 * note to mods: terrible consistency — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.228.93.213 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. Non-notable vanity, no Google hits (excluding Wikipedia of course).&#160;—  The KMan  talk  22:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.