Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artemis Fowl (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Artemis Fowl (film)
WP:NOT a Crystal Ball. -- Shane (talk/contrib) 23:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - real film in production (devlopmental hell)..keep. andrew 10:44, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - when things start being confirmed about the film, it might be a useful article to have. Before then, we're crystal balling. BigHaz 12:35, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. I'm especially uncomfortable with the amount of space this article devotes to rumors. An encyclopedia is not a rumor mill. I'd not oppose this article being recreated when more concrete information is available (and can be cited). Scorpiondollprincess 13:34, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. Danny Lilithborne 13:56, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. For a film to be in production means that they are actually filming it, not just planning it. Since most roles have not been cast yet, the film can't be in production. --Metropolitan90 02:22, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Delete --Vergardio 01:01, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.