Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artemis Fowl (film) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Artemis Fowl (film)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Help fixing AfD: Original reason is: Crystal balling, pure and simple. Original nominator:. Originally nominated at 11:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC) Original nomination text: Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Well referenced and project is developed enough.Valkyrie Cain (talk) 12:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC) — striking sockpuppet !vote per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:20, 20 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Merge per WP:NFF: "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no 'sure thing' production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available." If filming does begin as planned, then we can have an article for the ages. If there is a delay, then the subject-material article can host content for the time being (or perhaps forever if nothing ever happens). See Shantaram (film) as an example where important players are attached but nothing has happened to result in an actual film. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 12:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep has received very substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 08:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. --IndyNotes (talk) 18:15, 28 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.