Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arteology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. RobertG &#9836; talk 13:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Arteology
Non-notable. Delete. Arteology came to my attention due it being erroneously categorised inCategory:Archaeological sub-disciplines; it is not an archaeological sub-discipline. A Google for "archaeology arteology" produces 128 hits, almost all of which are versions of this page.

A Google forarteology alone returns 670-odd hits from a few design, art and architecture firms using the word as a trademark and this page which appears to be the source of the article text and is one, apparently anonymous individual's research page. although there is a field of artefact studies I do not feel that anything on this page usefully describes that discipline or it reads like an encyclopaedia article. I also am becoming tired of de-categorising it every few days. adamsan 21:53, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Ze miguel 21:57, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Stifle 00:35, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.