Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur's Teacher Trouble


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn (based on the good work of Tokyogirl)Toddst1 (talk) 12:41, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Arthur's Teacher Trouble

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BKCRIT. Has some passing mentions in children's literature/education but nothing that would satisfy WP:BKCRIT #4. Tagged since January 2009. Toddst1 (talk) 22:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Good article, but needs references and work.  LogicalCreator (talk) 02:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I was almost certain that I'd end up voting delete, but it looks like there is coverage of this book out there. I found one book that talks about ATT heavily and two in-depth articles about it, and I'm just getting started. I think it's that this was one of the first Living Books to come out is why it's gotten so much attention. I've noticed that it's also part of some teaching plans at schools as well: I'll hold off on voting until I'm finished, though.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:29, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've done some digging and found a plethora of sources, although I did have to really dig hard for them. I admit raising an eyebrow over some of the stuff discussed in some of the journals, but coverage in peer reviewed journals still counts as a RS. I also saw where this is used fairly regularly in classrooms, as shown above, and it's received a couple of reviews. I have to say that I was surprised at the amount of coverage it got.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.