Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur "Artie" DeMello


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  14:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Arthur "Artie" DeMello

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced self-promotion ("references" are self-published). A search for independent, reliable coverage revealed only a few passing mentions. GermanJoe (talk) 09:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 10:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 10:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 13:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass notability guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Classic WP:SPAM and WP:COI, with User talk:Ademello59 being the obvious SPA/creator (his sole Wikipedia activity on an April day in 2011). This has been citation tagged for several years without improvement in the slightest, and there's no evidence this fellow passes the GNG.  Reads like it's off the fellow's brochure.   Ravenswing   16:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete unless appropriate evidence is provided. Way too much unreferenced information and no indication of notability. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  16:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete like all the others, it should be deleted Ovo16 (talk) 13:51, 9 August 2015 (UTC) per WP:SOCKSTRIKE Kraxler (talk) 12:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO and WP:NMUSIC.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:03, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.