Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur D. Cooble


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result wasSpeedily Deleted as vandalism.  Dloh  cierekim  Deleted?  14:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Arthur D. Cooble

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Hoax, no sources, no Google hits. See also Articles for deletion/Cooble. fschoenm (talk) 20:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Kafka Liz (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Is not Hoax, obscure Minister, am currently looking for references —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrPlow09 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Do not Delete, that is very strange Dhartung, I am very curious to why he isnt showing up, I will look into it more —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrPlow09 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:BALLS. Nice try, but a federal minister of education would show up on a search of biographi.ca. --Dhartung | Talk 21:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete Is not hoax, my history 12 textbooks contain a lot of information on this great man. Is not a hoax. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FrEaK40 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - hoax. Note that the two contributors above are SPAs editing only on this and Cooble. JohnCD (talk) 22:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - hoax, no sources. Delete. Macy's123 (review me) 23:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment has removed the AfD notice from both articles.  At time of writing, they are his only edits. JuJube (talk) 23:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G3, as blatant and obvious misinformation. Deor (talk) 00:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, G3 And it's obvious BobSmith25 is a sock of the page's creator, .Blueboy96 02:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and I'm placing the tag on both articles now, also WP:SNOW.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 12:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Will make some due diligence checks, and then off it should go. Dloh  cierekim  Deleted?  14:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.