Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Dietrich (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 00:51, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Arthur Dietrich
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Scarcely referenced, original research about a fictional character presented almost completely within the fictional context. There are notable characters, but Arthur Dietrich isn't one.

The previous AFD was closed as "no consensus" inappropriately. The reasons against deletion claimed that references were available, but the fact is the references cited were not specifically enumerated -- and they were not non-trivial sources. Of course this character appears in a book that enumerates all 70's sitcom; but there has been no citation given which deeply analyzes the character. -- Mikeblas (talk) 04:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete and Redirect as there's still nothing at all, frankly there's never going to be anything in the future too, to suggest this can be its own actual convincing article. SwisterTwister   talk  20:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe deckertalk 01:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect, the subject of the article is mentioned in a few secondary sources but only trivially and in reference to fictional characters as a whole, and thus fails to meet WP:GNG, the previous AfD (no consensus) fails to convince me that there's any reason to keep this article around either. Mr rnddude (talk) 01:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Barney Miller (and Weak Delete as not entirely necessary but extremely unlikely to be useful content to save). Sources don't look to justify a stand-alone article. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 13:37, 4 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.