Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur F. Carmazzi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete of recreated non-notable subject article. Dreadstar ☥  21:09, 29 January 2011 (UTC)'''

Arthur F. Carmazzi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD, unsourced BLP, and I've been unable to find anything that would source this... however, the number of complaints I've received over the PROD is making me kick this here for more discussion. Courcelles 18:18, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - unsourced BLP, obviously promotional, reeks of spin-doctoring. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete unreferenced promotional material. Dlabtot (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 14:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unable to locate any reliable sources that can establish notability under WP:BIO criteria. --- Barek (talk) - 17:17, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article looks like a self-promotional piece, subject is not notable.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 23:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Forgive me for not knowing what a BLP is, I follow a number of thinkers including and have met him personally at an event. His ideas and processes a very unique and he has made a difference in at least my life and many of my colleagues. I do not know why one would delete him, he adds value in content and as a person who has made an impact --180.249.132.107 (talk) 01:59, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.249.132.107 (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Dear All, The article by Arthur F. carmazzi is worth a read and i adre say inspirational. The fact of the matter is that such self made individuals are few. Prophetically admitted phrase that "wise are those who learn from others mistakes and foolish are those who learn from their own" holds so good here. Readers must learn from such leaders of sorts. The article must stay on and be read by as many as possible readers. [Aalok Sood]       — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.146.246 (talk • contribs)

Dear All, I have recently attended a workshop from Arthur F Carmazzi, in Bangalore, though the "Color Brain Theory" what he suggests and authored, could not termed as 100% scientific,yet it is worth pondering over. When we are accepting the similar topics like "Kinesics" or "Body language", N.L.P, Graphology etc, why can't we a serious thought over his view on " Categorizing the people based their psychological patterns" I request the authorities of "Wikipeadia" to retain this article and not to delete in order to follow democracy. Dr.Raghu. B.S. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.96.34.92 (talk) 18:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


 * SPEEDY DELETE and SALT as previously deleted at AfD. I want everybody to look at this:   I initially nominated the article for deletion back in April, 2008.  At the time, Carmazzi was identified as a notorious wikispammer who had not only written a non-notable article about himself, but then had inserted links to it throughout Wikipedia, and then had tried to hijack the AfD discussion with a bunch of sock IPs, exactly as he is doing now.  This time, he has committed the additional deceit of posting the article about himself at Arthur F. Carmazzi, rather than the original Arthur Carmazzi, in order to deceptively try to keep from the WP community the fact that he was already previously deleted at AfD.  Since this article has already gone through AfD, this AfD is superfluous, and per policy the article should be speedied forthwith, by the first admin who sees this message.  Thank you. Qworty (talk) 20:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

While you are entitled to do as you wish, the suggestion that any comments are "bunch of sock IPs" is uncalled for - perhaps you could be a bit more professional in your accusations - perhaps in the spirit of wikipedia, try facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.249.132.107 (talk) 05:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

To whom it may concern, we are the Office of Mr Arthur F carmazzi. We have noticed that the Arthur F Carmazzi page is now linked to other pages which is making Mr Carmazzi look bad. We are sure that Wikipedia has no intention of defaming Mr Carmazzi's reputation but the wikipage is on the 3rd line of google when you enter his name. Firstly, we would like you to reconsider his notability, we can provide you with Asian publications and TV interview clips that prove that. Second, If you do not wish to include Mr Carmazzi in wikipedia, then please remove the defamatory references which are unfounded and unprofessional. We can provide any administrator a list of contacts whose lives and businesses are touched by Mr Carmazzi's work and who are willing to testify for him. Thirdly, we would invite you to search for Mr Carmazzi's work in Asia such as Baidu and Google him for his work in Asia where he has been based for almost 20 years. Wikipedia is not just about US and Asia is growing in many respects. Please inform our office as soon as possible when this is done. If you need to contact me, please email Mr Wayan (wayan@carmazzi.net) Wayang.afc (talk) 10:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)