Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Godfrey Peuchen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Arthur Godfrey Peuchen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable Titanic passenger –dlthewave ☎ 19:20, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:51, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:51, 22 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Apart from the DCB entry already in the article, see here at the Toronto Sun, here at the Vancouver Sun, here and here at The Star, this book where he warrants a full chapter, this book where he gets a smaller but significant mention. There are probably others, but that should suffice to show he meets WP:GNG. PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:42, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep He has an article in the Dictionary of Canadian Biography which, per WP:ANYBIO, is a strong primal facie indicator of notability. Atchom (talk) 04:18, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * keep, reads as notable. Szzuk (talk) 20:18, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * keep As per PohranicniStraze, and Atchom there certaily looks like enough to meet notability requirements. Curdle (talk) 07:29, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * keep Passes WP:ANYBIO.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:23, 29 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.