Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Kenneth Barton (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Arthur Kenneth Barton
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't see him as meeting our notability standards. The article was kept, in the early days of wp, as no consensus ... but even the discussion at that AfD would not seem to support a no consensus close under today's standards. Epeefleche (talk) 01:49, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Searches (Google, Highbeam, Questia) turned up nothing significant on this person, just mirrors of previous Wikipedia article versions. Fails WP:ANYBIO and I don't see evidence that his publications, as discussed in the 2006 AfD, would take him to WP:AUTHOR. AllyD (talk) 07:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability not apparent. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:39, 4 November 2013 (UTC).
 * Delete. Secondary school teachers are usually not notable, barring extraordinary evidence, and here we have no evidence at all. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no evidence of notability; per David Eppstein. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 18:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete headmasters of public schools (in the proper British sense), especially those historical (i.e. not BLP in land), yes, minimal stubs on lower ranking professionals, however hard working, no, unless they played a single game of first class cricket, in which case that's entirely different. Barney the barney barney (talk) 11:59, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete unless expanded in a way that proves notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:16, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.