Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Meaby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. TLA (talk) 03:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Arthur Meaby

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable individual, lack of independent SIGCOV GraziePrego (talk) 02:59, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople,  and United Kingdom. GraziePrego (talk) 02:59, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:12, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Full obituary in a major national newspaper. We have always considered this to be sufficient for notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:15, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Youth Hostels Association (England & Wales): Fails GNG and NBIO. Single source in article is OBIT, with all the normal issues that go with using OBITs as sources. BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Ping me if SIGCOV sources from WP:IS are added to the article. GNG requires multiple, IS, SIGCOV, sources.  // Timothy :: talk  18:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * There is absolutely nothing wrong with using obits in national newspapers as sources. Not sure why you think there is. By capitalising, you seem to be suggesting that the page you want is WP:OBIT, which I'm sure isn't it given it has no relevance to this article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist, to consider recent expansion/addition of sources by Rublamb. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: I expanded the article and added more sources. Although I would like to see additional sources (especially on his work designing railroad carriages), I am convinced that Meaby is notable and worthy of coverage beyond the suggested link to the organization's article. I also agree that a bi-line obituary in The Guardian pretty much proves notability. Rublamb (talk) 17:55, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - Based on the Obituary and expanded sources, this would suffice. Perfectstrangerz (talk) 02:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.