Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Yin Fan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 17:51, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Arthur Yin Fan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Autobiographical article which is almost entirely unverified and seems to be unverifiable. Not only does it lack sufficient sources to meet baseline notability, but the subject also appears to fail the professor test. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  08:37, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG, and seems to be an autobiography and advert for someone. Mdann52 (talk) 11:07, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sources to verify anything. Non-notable, as mentioned above. TippyGoomba (talk) 05:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 01:17, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. A GS h-index of 8 is not enough for the highly cited field of biomed. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC).
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, WP:PROF. -- Scray (talk) 03:29, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.