Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur oakeshott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Arthur oakeshott
Looks like another random World War II solduer Delete --Jaranda wat's sup 04:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC) Keep It I know the Dates and facts to be true Bold textKeepBold textthe dates are proven in census and the facts are legitimate &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.135.212.219 (talk &bull; contribs).
 * Delete as unverifiable. No Google hits for 'Arthur Oakeshott' or variations in spelling. No Incywincy hits either. Eddie.willers 05:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I would like to find out if there are any notable references on him, could be one of the first embeded reporters. BTW he served in WWI, and was a reporter in WWII. Mike (T C) [[Image:Star_of_life2.svg|20px]] 06:33, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-23 07:45Z 
 * Delete as vanity - Speedy? &mdash;This user has left wikipedia  12:41 2006-01-23
 * Delete vanity. --Terence Ong 13:19, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. The British Army 'Queen's Regiment' was formed in 1966! Prior to that, groups bearing the word 'Queen' as part of their title were not formally known as 'Queen's Regiment'. Many of those groups fought at the Somme so which one was Oakeshott a member of, hmmm? Eddie.willers 16:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - bad joke. Latinus 21:59, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable. Without cited sources, there is no proof this person exists.&#160;—  The KMan  talk  23:26, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's nothing I can find to verify this guy's existance.  Jtmichcock 00:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.