Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Article 25


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Maxwell Hutchinson. feel free to merge any content if necessary JForget  21:50, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Article 25

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

However noble, I don't think this group is notable. Irbisgreif (talk) 06:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:22, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Despite sounding like it does lots of worthy things, I don't see more than primary-sources "we do this" and explanations of the importance of what they do (can't ride the coattails of that). Without independent sources writing about them, they fail WP:CORP. I can't believe that something that has (per its claims on its website) important involvement in so many projects in so many places hasn't been written about in some newspapers or other reliable and independent sources. The generic nature of its name makes it hard to search for such refs, but even the first few pages of googling don't find useful material and google-news for "article25" charity or "article 25" charity find nothing more than one or two passing mentions. DMacks (talk) 08:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The nom is right. Very noble of them, very good of them to do this.  But I don't see much notability.  Gotta say delete here.  Please, somebody change my mind on this. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep week keep or redirect to Maxwell Hutchinson. I don't think an organization should be deleted simply because it has a really stupid generic name, which is difficult to search for. I found Article 25 London charity which has 162 Google hits, with many of the most prominent newspapers of Britain. Notable. Ikip (talk) 07:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Looking at the news sources, I realize they are not as strong as I thought. Ikip (talk) 07:24, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.